MAIN
| OBJECTIVES | STANDARDS
| BACKGROUND | PROCEDURES | ASSESSMENT
Research
has shown that:
-
children familiar with a setting tend
to learn more than those who are not (Balling and
Falk, 19801; Wolins et al., 1992)
2.
-
orientation programs facilitate cognitive
learning, especially when conducted by a teacher
(Balling, Falk and Aronson, undated)3.
-
both cognitive and affective learning
can be increased when teachers use structured activities
before and/or after a visit to an aquarium to create
a context for the experience and link it with classroom
work (Finson and Enochs, 19874; Koran,
Lehman, Shafer and Koran, 19835; Wolins
et al., 19922).
Therefore, the South Carolina Aquarium requires that
all students visiting the aquarium as part of a structured
school program watch the South Carolina Aquarium orientation
video prior to their visit. The video will introduce
students to the main message of the Aquarium, to the
aquarium building and its inhabitants, and to the overall
structure of their class visit.
The
South Carolina Aquarium helps visitors to understand that
from the mountains to the sea, each region of South Carolina
is connected, yet distinct. Across South Carolina’s regions,
the habitats are ever changing. Each habitat has its own character
which is shaped by physical and biological conditions and
by people, both past and present. The more that is known about
each habitat, the better humans will be able to safeguard
them and ensure that the habitats are managed in a balanced
way. All of the plants, animals, and habitats that students
will see at the aquarium can be found in South Carolina. By
watching the orientation video, students can build prior knowledge
of what the habitats they are visiting will be like. They
will also have prior knowledge of what the Aquarium will be
like, which will cut down on bewilderment, and increase the
amount of time the students can spend focusing on learning.
Bibliography
-
Balling, J.D., and Falk, J.H. (1980).
A perspective on field trips: Environmental effects
on learning. Curator, 23, 229-240.
-
Wolins, I.S., Jensen, N., and Ulzheimer,
R. (1992). Children’s memories of field trips: A
qualitative study. Journal of Museum Education,
17(2), 17-27.
-
Balling, J.D., Falk, J.H. and Aronson,
R. (undated). Pretrip programs: An exploration of
their effects on learning from a single-visit field
trip to a zoological park. Washington DC: Smithsonian
Institute, Office of Educational Research.
-
Finson, K.D., and Enochs, L.G. (1987).
Student attitudes toward science-technology-society
resulting from a visit to a science-technology museum.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
24, 593-609.
-
Koran, J.J. Jr., Lehman, J.R., Shafer,
L.D., and Koran, M.L. (1983). The relative effects
of pre- and postattention directing devices on learning
from a "walk-through" museum exhibit.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20,
341-346.